Presentation observation 1

Khaled Salem Al Zaabi, H00234756
 

Date: 11^th November 2012
 

Venue: W104
 

Time: 10.30

Khaled introduced the topic clearly: his trip to Europe in 2008. He made some eye contact with the audience but could improve this. He stood at the side of the screen and occasionally consulted his notes but this did not disrupt his flow. He did not read from cards or screen. He spoke clearly enough but could make more effort re. loudness and register.

The slides were excellent with minimal text. Like the slides on Istanbul, they were clear, colourful and informative. Some of the most visually arresting images were photos taken by Khaled himself e.g. the illuminated Eiffel Tower and the pictures of the Paris Opera House.

The first student to do a semi-formal presentation, Khaled started quietly but grew in confidence. He smiled a lot, made several humorous asides and increasingly appeared relaxed and assured. He fielded all questions quickly and competently. Overall, it was an informative, interesting and entertaining presentation.

166 words.

Istanbul

Reflection example

Reflection on meeting

Venue: research & innovation centre

Date: Sunday 18th March

Present:

Abdulqadar, H00235057, Chairman

Nabil, H00159003, Secretary

Ahmed Salah, H00138689, Participant

Abdulqadar opened the meeting in an appropriate manner & introduced the items on the agenda clearly. He directed the meeting successfully from 1 item to the next.

The problem under discussion was Emiratisation.

The first item to be discussed was the lack of information from the private sector for students while they are studying. Nabil: HCT has many graduates and they mostly go to government jobs because they don't know about the private sector.

The next issue was the fact that government alone cannot provide jobs for all nationals. Ahmed: we need a better balance between government & the private sector. Students should be encouraged to get work experience in the private sector. Nabil: at present, work experience is always in the government sector. Ahmed: students are afraid of the risks involved in working in the private sector. Nabil: we need theory classes re. the top 5 government & top 5 private companies. Even if most students opt for government jobs, some will opt for private & hopefully this number will grow. Ahmed: we need a special programme for students before they graduate. Nabil: the biggest problem is lack of info: the students need clarity.

Hedley asked why it was important to direct students to the private sector. He was told that government cannot provide jobs for all graduates. Those not getting government jobs either work for semi- government institutions, like Nabil, or remain idle until a government post, for which they are not necessarily qualified, turns up.

Recommendations:

1. Special programme for students before they graduate.
2. More clear inf0 re. private sector.
3. Work placement in private sector as well as government, so that students can decide, government or private.
4. Need for people to be qualified to do specific jobs.
5. It would be good for more private companies to follow HSBC's lead in training Emiratis, sending them abroad for training & work experience, and, finally, employing them in full-time positions.

All 3 students contributed to the meeting; it was well-directed; the secretary made notes; views were expressed clearly & politely;the discussion flowed freely and was always interesting.

Reflection on meeting

Date: Tuesday 9^th October, 2012

Venue: W104

Time: 1130

Chairman: Ahmed Nabil

Secretary: Ahmed Naser

Participant, in the role of family court representative: Abdulla Reehan

Participant, representing women’s rights: Khuloud

Topic: divorce in the UAE

 

Ahmed Nabil opened the meeting to consider the growing problem of divorce in the UAE. Invited to list the main reasons for divorce in this country, Khuloud cited:

a) family interference

b) marriage to foreigners

c) dowries

d) arranged marriages.

Abdulla Reehan talked about the adverse psychological effect of divorce on children.

a)     Khuloud mentioned that the practice of living in close proximity to extended family often caused interference in a married couple’s life by other family members. This often led to resentment on the part of either spouse.

b)    Ahmed Naser gave an example of an acquaintance who had married a foreigner: he was a local man with an Omani mother who had married an Omani girl. Although both were Arabs, the different customs and traditions of Omani and Emirati had caused friction and marital problems.

c)     The exorbitant size of dowry payments was discussed as a cause of early friction and discontent.

d)    Khuloud mentioned that arranged marriages could also lead to disharmony and ultimately separation and divorce.

Recommendations:

i)                   Ahmed Nabil emphasized that there needs to be better education to prepare young couples for the pressures and problems of married life. The others concurred. How this would work in practice was not discussed in great detail.

ii)                In the event of marital problems, Khuloud suggested a cooling-off period. She thought that something like a marriage guidance advisory service should be developed. The others agreed.

iii)              Co-education would be a good preparation for both workplace and marriage, although it was accepted that this would be opposed by many and would require careful implementation.

 

           The meeting was well controlled by Ahmed Nabil. All members contributed to the discussion.

Ahmed Nabil closed the meeting at 1150.

307 words

Meeting report

Problem: traffic congestion in Abu Dhabi


Date of meeting: 7th March 2011
Time of meeting: 16:10
Venue: W007
Group members:
Chair: Abdul-Aziz.
Secretary: Jaber.
Participant: Hedley.
Venue preparation:

Grouping of chairs round tables



Agenda:
Underground parking.
Paid parking/short term – long term.
Congestion charge / taxes / restrictions.
Public transport.
Increase age of driver (i.e. licences only at a later age than the present system allows).




The chairman Abdul Aziz opened the meeting at 16:32
1. Underground parking.
Jaber said it is a good idea
Hedley worried about the price.
Abdul Aziz said the cost of underground parking should be limited. Hedley asked if new buildings were required to have sufficient parking space. Were the regulations enforced? Jaber said no.
2. Paid parking ( short term & long term )
This is now quite common in Abu Dhabi and it has reduced congestion.
Hedley pointed out that some residents who have bought 1 or 2 permits still can’t find space to park. Abdul Aziz suggested designated areas for short-term parking. People who buy permits should have designated spaces. Hedley suggested and Jaber and Abdul Aziz agreed.
3. Congestion charge /taxes/restrictions.
Hedley asked if a Salik-type system as in Dubai would work in Abu Dhabi. Jaber pointed out it would be more difficult as there is no metro for people to use instead of their cars. The extra workload on the police of enforcing extra restrictions, and the cost + delay of implementing such schemes was mentioned by Jaber + Abdul Aziz.
4. Public transport
Abdul Aziz suggested a new metro. Hedley asked if there was enough space in the town for a metro. Jaber said there is room if construction is carefully planned. He also suggested free parking 08:00-15:00 so all workers could leave their cars at home. Abdul Aziz highlighted the need for a number of stations in all areas.
5. Increased age of driver?
Jaber thought this is a bad idea- many younger drivers are needed in families where older members have died or cannot drive. Abdul Aziz pointed out that 18 year olds need to get to college. If you live in Shahama a car is the only way.
In conclusion we thought that:

1. Underground parking is a good idea. Rules about new buildings having adequate parking must be strictly enforced.
2. Paid parking has made the situation better but more thought is needed, e.g. on permits and designating special time +space.
3. We were in favor of more restrictions like the Salik card.
4. We liked the idea of building public transport, especially a metro.

Interview report

Date: Monday 24^th September 2012

Venue: F11

Time: 1515

Interviewee: Manea Mohamed Al Mehairi

Interviewers:   Hedley Butterfield

Post: Internal Audit Officer

Hedley welcomed Manea, introduced the other two interviewers and invited the interviewee to introduce himself. Mana greeted the interview panel and talked readily about himself. There was good eye contact and his body language and general demeanour suggested a high degree of self-confidence.

When answering questions as to his experience, ability to handle pressure, personal goals and so on, Manea spoke loudly and clearly, with very good vocabulary and a high level of articulacy. He used  strongly effective language, with only minor grammatical infelicities. His discourse was at all times relevant and easily comprehensible.

There were no nervous habits and visual cues suggested high confidence. It was obvious that there was a great deal of preparation.

When asked if he had any questions for the interviewers, he had several pertinent queries, including whether he would have any opportunity in his new position to offer ongoing input into his job and its development.

Manea was perhaps at his best when asked to talk about his outside interests. He revealed his passion for food and is clearly something of a gastronome. His tastes in food are very wide-ranging: he mentioned his liking for sushi ( he visited Japan briefly for a seminar), Chinese and Vietnamese food. He is quite widely travelled and when asked about his favourite travel destination. He chose Italy, despite what he described as crazy Italian drivers. He highlighted  Venice, a unique experience as he called it, Bologna, for a book fair, and Florence. Part of the attraction, he said, was the wonderful food but he praised also the warm, friendly people.

Overall, Manea was communicatively  excellent, with fluent delivery. He was relaxed, forthcoming, chatty and a pleasure to interview.

303 words